Writer: Roy Thomas
Pencils and inks: Herb Trimpe
Who cares about the Cobalt Man? Roy Thomas, apparently.
( Read more... )
Writer: Roy Thomas
Pencils and inks: Herb Trimpe
Who cares about the Cobalt Man? Roy Thomas, apparently.
( Read more... )
Writer: John Ostrander
Pencils and inks: Graham Nolan
War of the Gods tie-in.
The old Thanagarian gods have come to Earth and are possessing innocent bystanders.
( Read more... )
Welcome back to Whatcha Reading! Here’s how we’re capping off this month:
Sneezy: I’ve been rereading Only Hope. It’s still ongoing, and I’m VERY much not a thriller person, but something about some Will Kill You cinnamon rolls is making my brain happy right now.
Lara: I’ve been so lucky with books lately. So many good ones! At the moment, I am knee deep in And Then There Was the One by Martha Waters. ( A | BN | K | AB ) It’s a 1930s murder mystery romance and the heroine is just the kind of grump that makes me happy.
Tara: I’m reading Can We Skip to the Good Part by Melissa Brayden. ( A | BN ) It’s her first self-published book after 10 years with a publisher and I’m really enjoying it.
Carrie: I’m just about to start Women of the Fairy Tale Resistance by Jane Harrington ( A | BN | K | AB ) and I’m SO EXCITED! Expect to see this book pop up in Kickass Women.
Whatcha reading? Let us know in the comments!
We’re officially in autumn now, folks, so take a big swig of that pumpkin spice latte [note to intern: find more up-to-date seasonal joke here, maybe find out what the kids on TikTok like] and enjoy this week’s top comment!
“No. No. This is intolerable. Rhino-Man can be drawn in a way that makes him look like the only hairs he has are twelve on his head, but you just wanted to show naked Bear-Plugger. You will not be written in the Book of Life!” –matt w
And the runners up! Very funny!
“Love the sour look on the guy trying to convince Henry to work from home. ‘God, what’ll it take to get rid of this schmo!?’ he thinks.” –Hibbleton
“The Hotel Bingham is just not even trying with its logo. ‘Yeah, yeah, lower-case Arial. That’s good enough for the meatbags who stay here.’” –Joe Blevins
“I’m impressed by Dick Tracy’s technical prowess here. Unlike most people his age, he’s noticed that Google no longer returns useful results. If he searched for her there, he’d get a dubious AI summary above several ads offering to sell ‘New and Used LaKoyles.’ Instead, he goes straight to a reliable source: The Neo-Chicago Daily, whose business model is based on chronicling local crimes and the reasons why police would be justified against any particular citizen.” –Nevin, on Patreon
“There have been a confusing amount of ‘red lines’ mentioned in reporting on climate science that supposedly indicate when we’ve crossed the critical threshold. But I have to say ‘Mary Worth faces death by climatic instability in a hot air balloon while hosting a narcissistic child’ is certainly a sign we’ve lost the fight and must prepare for centuries of disruption.” –Philip
“That’s not the bathroom mirror. That’s Crankshaft’s Dorian Gray portrait, but his soul is so vile and repugnant that it’s only able to take on about half of the physical effects.” –TheDiva
“‘You be sure to have some cake now’ is going to be my new favorite phrase for patronizing dismissal.” –pugfuggly
“Gosh, I hope the poor, innocent trees don’t suffer any serious damage.” –Bob Tice
“The other balloonivators landed when the ground crews radioed the warning about the approaching front. Unfortunately, Stanley didn’t hear it, because he’d turned off his hearing aid after fifteen minutes of listening to Olive and Mary’s inane chatter.” –Ken
“Oh, come on! You can plainly see there’s no other headstones nearby, of course this gentleman got a big enough plot, that’s not the problem here. It’s the lack of plot holes, just the way any novelist would want it.” –I’m Not Cthulhu, But I Play Him On TV
“The flag in Gearhead Gertie today was a great move; really clarified everything. That had, truly, been the great question on my mind all along, and now I know.” –A Grave Mind
“I’m almost as shocked by this strip’s implications as the wide-eyed kids it’s depicting are! They’ve never met their step-dad before today? They didn’t even attend the wedding? And Steppy McStep-Step there is apparently part of their EMPTY PINK VOID of a house?’ –Victor Von
“Which of the following is most representative of the current state of Beetle Bailey: (a) Only now discovering the 30 year old concept of ‘casual Friday,’ now that workplaces have commonly gone to ‘business casual’ as a default; or (b) thinking that the concept of ‘casual Friday’ could apply to on-duty members of the United States Army?” –Rube
“It’s casual Friday because Gen. Halftrack isn’t there, having been called to Quantico for the all-generals meeting, where he’ll be elevated to the Joint Chiefs. Or maybe executed. The real story is that somebody high up remembered that Camp Swampy still exists.” –Tom T.
“The Smifs hit a new low of hillbilly stereotype by being reduced to eating literal roadkill for dinner. They attempt to take their minds off this depressing horror with jokes. Unfortunately, their writer wouldn’t know a joke if it kicked him in the nuts, so their torment simply persists eternally. Sad!” –ectojazzmage
Remember: If you want an ad-free version of this site sent to you every day via email, for $3 a month you can become a Comics Curmudgeon newsletter subscriber! And if you never want to see banner ads on this site, and want to get cool comment-editing features to boot, for the same low price you can become a Comics Curmudgeon website subscriber! You can get each day’s post ad-free via Patreon if that’s your style! And if you just want to give me money directly, you can put some scratch in my tip jar! Thanks to all for your support and readership!
Writers: Karl and Barbara Kesel
Pencils: Paris Cullins
Inks: Denis Rodier
What is it with all these robots causing trouble in Georgetown?
( Read more... )
These Violent Delights by Chloe Gong is $2.99 and a Kindle Daily Deal! This is a YA (bordering on NA possibly?) historical fantasy with Romeo & Juliet, star crossed lovers vibes. I also loved the setting of 1920s Shanghai.
Perfect for fans of The Last Magician and Descendant of the Crane, this heart-stopping debut is an imaginative Romeo and Juliet retelling set in 1920s Shanghai, with rival gangs and a monster in the depths of the Huangpu River.
The year is 1926, and Shanghai hums to the tune of debauchery.
A blood feud between two gangs runs the streets red, leaving the city helpless in the grip of chaos. At the heart of it all is eighteen-year-old Juliette Cai, a former flapper who has returned to assume her role as the proud heir of the Scarlet Gang—a network of criminals far above the law. Their only rivals in power are the White Flowers, who have fought the Scarlets for generations. And behind every move is their heir, Roma Montagov, Juliette’s first love…and first betrayal.
But when gangsters on both sides show signs of instability culminating in clawing their own throats out, the people start to whisper. Of a contagion, a madness. Of a monster in the shadows. As the deaths stack up, Juliette and Roma must set their guns—and grudges—aside and work together, for if they can’t stop this mayhem, then there will be no city left for either to rule.
RECOMMENDED: To Have and to Hoax by Martha Waters is $1.99! Aarya read this one and gave it a B:
Despite all these points, I adored To Have and to Hoax. It made me giggle constantly during a week when I had little to smile about. I wouldn’t recommend it to everyone; if the antics sound juvenile and infuriating, then you won’t like the story. But if you’re in the mood to escape into a Regency romp and swoon over a married couple falling in love again, I recommend To Have and to Hoax as your escape of choice.
In this fresh and hilarious historical rom-com, an estranged husband and wife in Regency England feign accidents and illness in an attempt to gain attention—and maybe just win each other back in the process.
Five years ago, Lady Violet Grey and Lord James Audley met, fell in love, and got married. Four years ago, they had a fight to end all fights, and have barely spoken since.
Their once-passionate love match has been reduced to one of cold, detached politeness. But when Violet receives a letter that James has been thrown from his horse and rendered unconscious at their country estate, she races to be by his side—only to discover him alive and well at a tavern, and completely unaware of her concern. She’s outraged. He’s confused. And the distance between them has never been more apparent.
Wanting to teach her estranged husband a lesson, Violet decides to feign an illness of her own. James quickly sees through it, but he decides to play along in an ever-escalating game of manipulation, featuring actors masquerading as doctors, threats of Swiss sanitariums, faux mistresses—and a lot of flirtation between a husband and wife who might not hate each other as much as they thought. Will the two be able to overcome four years of hurt or will they continue to deny the spark between them?
With charm, wit, and heart in spades, To Have and to Hoax is a fresh and eminently entertaining romantic comedy—perfect for fans of Jasmine Guillory and Julia Quinn.
Undiscovered by Anna Hackett is $1.49 at Amazon! This is the first book in the Treasure Hunter Security romantic suspense series. Several of the other books in the series are also on sale. I’ve enjoyed Hackett’s other books and am intrigued by the setup. I believe Hackett’s books were also mentioned in the comments of an Action Adventure Rec League.
One former Navy SEAL. One dedicated archeologist. One secret map to a fabulous lost oasis.
Finding undiscovered treasures is always daring, dangerous, and deadly. Perfect for the men of Treasure Hunter Security. Former Navy SEAL Declan Ward is haunted by the demons of his past and throws everything he has into his security business–Treasure Hunter Security. Dangerous archeological digs – no problem. Daring expeditions – sure thing. Museum security for invaluable exhibits – easy. But on a simple dig in the Egyptian desert, he collides with a stubborn, smart archeologist, Dr. Layne Rush, and together they get swept into a deadly treasure hunt for a mythical lost oasis. When an evil from his past reappears, Declan vows to do anything to protect Layne.
Dr. Layne Rush is dedicated to building a successful career–a promise to the parents she lost far too young. But when her dig is plagued by strange accidents, targeted by a lethal black market antiquities ring, and artifacts are stolen, she is forced to turn to Treasure Hunter Security, and to the tough, sexy, and too-used-to-giving-orders Declan. Soon her organized dig morphs into a wild treasure hunt across the desert dunes. Danger is hunting them every step of the way, and Layne and Declan must find a way to work together…to not only find the treasure but to survive.
Rough Love by Lauren Landish is $2.99 at Amazon! This came out in December and is the first book in the Tannen Boys series. There seems to be some catnip here with a second chance romance and single parent heroine. However, it seems like the heroine is dealing with some trauma. Feel free to poke around Goodreads reviews to protect yourself.
Second chances aren’t always easy.
Sometimes, it takes some Rough Love.
Bruce Tannen is better known by his nickname, Brutal, because once upon a time, he was a monster on the football field.
Now, he’s a farmhand on what used to be his family’s land, and change is all around him.
A new family, new expectations, and even new friends. It’s all just fine by him until he runs into the one woman to ever hold his heart. The past comes back with a wallop of a tackle that even he can’t take.
Allyson left him a lifetime ago, but she’s the only thing that’s ever felt right… in his arms, in his heart, in his life.
Something’s different, though. She’s a shadow of her former self, and he wonders what could’ve dulled her shine.
He can help fight her demons to bring back that sunny smile he used to bask in, but should he?
Allyson Meyers knew who she was and where she was going, but a wrong turn years ago took her on a journey she never imagined. Not even in her worst nightmares.
It was ugly, but she’s stronger now for the one person who matters… her son, Cooper.
Being a single mother is a burden she’s grateful to bear alone until she sees a pair of all-too-familiar broad shoulders and dark, knowing eyes that remind her of who she once was.
Bruce was the one she’d left behind, the path she should’ve taken. It’s too bad you can’t rewrite history. But if she’s brave enough, maybe they could create a new future?
Can Bruce open his heart to the one who shattered it?
And can Allyson blend who she is now with who she used to be and live the happily ever after she should’ve had?
Rough Love is a full-length Romance with an HEA, no cheating, and no cliffhanger. It can be read as a standalone.
Continuing my mini series on the wonders of punctuation, let's take a look at what happens when grammar goofs go horribly, seriously funny.
Drat. They're on to me.
Because no matter what your efforts, there will be times when you ask for a symbol and get a whole lotta trouble instead.
When a simple slash turns into a case of indecent exposure.
For clarity's sake, you might want to mention when a word should be plural.
Don't.
In fact, you should never spell anything out. Period.
Especially the actual period. Period.
And you know what they say about bad commas, don't you?
That's right: they always come back to bite you.
"Good night, good luck, must dash!"
- Edward R. Murrow with a full bladder
Thanks to Kristin D., Kristin S., Stephanie A., Doreen L., Kate A. for what I'm calling our "literal" period.
*****
P.S. Here's a giggle for my coffee-loving friends:
:D
It comes in both Men's & Women's cuts, plus a bunch more colors.
*****
And from my other blog, Epbot:
Writer: Beau Smith
Pencils: Marc Campos
Inks: Dan Davis
Underworld Unleashed tie-in.
Joe Gardner returns to Earth and tries to take over Guy’s life.
( Read more... )
It is with a lot of listener and reader encouragement that I’m writing this out, so thank you to everyone who said, “Yes, write the thing.”
You might be thinking, given that we are rather familiar with plagiarism going back to 2008 (!) with our adventures with Cassie Edwards’ books, that I would know what to do if it maybe happened to me.
And, honestly, I’m used to being cited in roundabout ways. Sometimes editors are totes ok with the whole “bitches” thing and sometimes editors, even at the same publication, are like, “Heck no” when citing the site. This is, btw, why I own trashybooks.com. There are many creative workarounds, including using my name.
On September 9th, 2025, I vented on Bluesky that I suspected my work had been used in an article without attribution, and I wasn’t sure how to proceed.
Yes, I really did not know what to do next.
I was extremely upset, and very confused, but I didn’t know the next step except to screech and wave my arms around.
Suleikha Snyder gave me some good advice: “Contact them and ask why it wasn’t sourced…. Citing sources, linking back to other works on the same subject, should be the bare minimum when someone is doing any sort of reporting or longform essay work.”
Then other journalists I’ve worked with reached out to me privately (thank you) while other writers in the romance community messaged me to say it had happened to them. Several times.
Which, no. That’s not okay.
I got excellent advice and really helpful support, and I’m deeply grateful about that.
Back in October 2024, I wrote about AI Narrators in Overdrive. Remember that? It was very popular – a lot of librarians emailed me after the link was circulated, including by the American Libraries Magazine newsletter, saying they were now working on AI policies for their collections.
In this article, I wrote about how Robin Bradford noticed some AI narration in her library’s catalog after a patron complained about the audio quality in one file. She started digging and got suspicious at the number of AI narrators in her library’s catalog (yikes) and then even more suspicious about the writers of said books.
So I reached out to her, and we did some digging, and that investigation formed the bulk of the article.
Fast forward to September 2025, when “Books by Bots: Librarians grapple with AI-generated material in collections,” an article written by a freelance journalist, is published in the American Libraries Magazine.
This article is available online, and was in the print magazine as well.
Please note, the above link may take a few moments to load because it’s an archive.org link to the original version of the article.
Y’all. I was super into it the minute I saw the headline.
This was what Robin and I had been investigating, and what I’d written about – how cool that it was in the ALA magazine?! Yes! Let’s talk about the proliferation of AI narrators, and AI authors, and how libraries are having to deal with infiltration of AI materials in their collections! This issue is important, and increased coverage is good!
I read it closely, noting details that seemed to match what I’d written, and waiting to spot a citation to my work.
There was none.
Like, what?
Why was my writing on AI narration was not cited in the article at all, when the text seems to reference specific details from my October 2024 article?
Based on the advice I received, I started by contacting the freelancer and an editor and publisher at the American Libraries Magazine.
I asked why I hadn’t been cited, and provided an example comparing my work from October 2024 to the article published in September 2025:
The text references my October 2024 article, “AI Audiobook Narrators in OverDrive and the Issue of Library AI Circulation Policy” which was the genesis of online discussion regarding AI narration in libraries.
The text…also references specific discoveries that Robin Bradford and I made, including notations about similar author names, lack of online presence, and the connection of these author profiles to Noah Lukeman and Lukeman Literary Management….
The American Libraries Magazine also cites my original article in a “Latest Links” post from October 2024, and links back to my original work: https://
americanlibrariesmagazine.org/ latest-links/spotting-ai- audiobook-narrators-and- authors-in-overdrive/ The language in the current article reads as follows, and both bolded (by me) sections appear to reference my work without a link or citation:
“Eklund is far from the only librarian grappling with AI issues. Last fall, Robin Bradford, a collection development librarian at a public library in Washington, accidentally bought an AI-narrated audiobook on OverDrive. Only after a patron checked it out and complained about a file-corruption issue did Bradford realize the book’s narrator was listed as “Scarlett (synthesized voice).” Looking through her library’s collection, she found more than 100 audiobook titles with the same narrator, all of them thrillers from Lukeman Literary Management.
So the audiobook narrators weren’t human. Were the authors themselves? With monikers such as Blake Pierce, Kate Bold, Molly Black, and Mia Gold, the authors appeared to have many titles to their names, but little to no social-media presence and only bare-bones websites with no substantive author bios—just a list of books written.
I’ve really appreciated the ways in which the American Libraries Magazine has supported my work in the past, and am dismayed to not be cited in an article on this topic.
I didn’t hear back from the freelance journalist, and still haven’t.
However, I did receive a reply from the editor, who said that they’d scanned the transcript of the interview the writer did with Robin, and reached out to the journalist and the editor of the story.
According to this editor, Robin mentioned my article, and the journalist based their reporting on their conversation with Robin, and “other sources.” Then the editor offered to add a “For more on this” link to my blog post, and did that seem reasonable.
My reply: no. This does not seem reasonable to me.
I replied with even more detail (and let me say, my blood pressure medication was getting a workout).
…To be clear, this paragraph uses information that appears to be directly lifted from my work:
So the audiobook narrators weren’t human. Were the authors themselves? With monikers such as Blake Pierce, Kate Bold, Molly Black, and Mia Gold, the authors appeared to have many titles to their names, but little to no social-media presence and only bare-bones websites with no substantive author bios—just a list of books written.
My work from the original post:
We started googling the authors and the results are very similar: websites that are mostly pages listing the books in a series, sparse bios that follow the same format of listing what series the author has written, and very, very few with social media outside of a Facebook Page…, and none of the social media accounts are linked from the author websites.
Let’s take another look at that list of names:
- Blake Pierce – website is all series lists, no social media linked, but does have a Facebook page
- Kate Bold – website is all series lists, no social media aside from a Facebook
grouppage, which isn’t linked that I could find.- Molly Black – website is all series lists, same template as Kate Bold, no social media
- Fiona Grace – website is all series lists, same template, no social media links
- Rylie Dark – website is all series lists, same template, no social media linked,
but I found a Twitter account, a Twitch account, and an OnlyFans**- Ava Strong – website is all series lists, no social media links
- Jack Mars – website is all series lists, no social media links
- Taylor Stark– website is all series lists, same template as Bold, no social media links
- Mia Gold – website is all series lists, same template, no social media
The names listed are in the same order, along with the details about basic websites, lists of books, and lack of social media presence.
Moreover, the question of whether the authors using AI narrators were AI themselves (“So the audiobook narrators weren’t human. Were the authors themselves?“) was the subject of Robin’s and my investigation in October, the details of which form the narrative of my work. Further, the involvement of Lukeman Literary was initially revealed in my article.
The paragraph I have mentioned should have been attributed to me, because a reasonable person would infer that this is [the writer’s] own reporting. I do not believe that it is.
This situation does not seem like a coincidence either, given the similarities in sequence and the details about investigating whether the AI narrated books were written by AI authors. This information appears to have been lifted from my work, and a responsible journalist would cite me as the source. A generous read would be that it was accidentally sloppy, and a more serious read would be that this is plagiarism.
If it was their own reporting, where did they get this information, in that order, if not from my work?
You mentioned they used other sources – could you tell me what those other sources are?
My request is as follows: I would like to be cited in the paragraph where my work was used without attribution, “as first reported by Smart Bitches.” I would also like an acknowledgement of this additional attribution at the bottom of the piece.
If that’s too much words and you’d like a TL;DR, no worries. I got you:
I received confirmation of receipt, but then no further updates.
UNTIL…I notice the article has been updated on September 15 with precisely what I asked for.
I did not hear back from the journalist at all, and beyond confirming receipt, I didn’t hear back from the editor, either. I discovered the updates on my own.
So on one hand, I’m very glad to have been cited!
Writing a story like that with links, screenshots, passing citations back and forth, and trying to write it cogently is a lot of labor. I appreciate very much that the article was updated to include attribution to the work that we did.
But on the other hand, I don’t think I should have had to argue repeatedly for credit for my writing in this case.
And I should not have had to point out that this journalist seems to have not done the job correctly the first time.
This is a basic, fundamental concept: cite your sources! And the need for citation seemed kind of obvious, from the fact that details we discovered appeared to be copied without attribution, to the part where the author names and details were listed in the same freaking order.
What’s funny is that I fret constantly about thorough attribution. Hell, I’m mad that Xitter links in the archives of the site are now broken because Xitter Xit the bed and folks understandably deleted their accounts! I’m peeved I didn’t screencap everything because my citations are broken.
Journalism is already in crisis ethically and professionally, with newspapers cowing to the current administration, firing journalists, and curbing or eliminating coverage based on pressure from oligarch owners and the government.
And, honestly, I don’t always consider myself a journalist. I am and have been a blogger, for more than 20 years.
Sometimes, though, I do a journalism.
And whether I’m blogging or doing a journalism, I know to cite my sources. I learned that in high school.
Moreover, I’m not going to be complacent when I think my work has been disrespected by another writer and by another publication. There’s enough of that going around already, and I’ve been doing this too long to tolerate any lack of attribution for the work I do on a website that is free and open for people to read.
So, if you think you’ve been plagiarized, here’s what I did:
I’m glad to have received the attribution I requested, and I’m glad the online version is updated to reflect it. The print version, of course, is not. And that’s what most librarians across the country have on their desks.
I want to call out this line from the “Books by Bots” article:
Even when the nature of an AI-generated work is clear, from a librarian’s point of view, there are potential copyright issues to consider. Does a book that may have plagiarized from other books belong in a library?
I dunno. Does an article that may have plagiarized another article belong in a library magazine?
This entire situation just sucks and I hope it doesn’t happen to you. And what’s most bothersome about this is not the lack of credit, but the fact that the intersection of generative AI and library policy is a deeply important issue.
The proliferation of AI-generated writing and narration affects the quality and reliability of library collections, at a time when libraries are already facing attacks from several directions.
Libraries in our country are already facing:
These are all extreme threats to the fundamental service that libraries provide, and to our ability to access information. And on top of all that, they’re also facing a multifaceted threat from AI-generated materials.
I’m on the side of libraries, full stop, and I’m also on the side of writers who are constantly doing the uphill battle to publish accurate information about current events. It’s exhausting, too: for context, this account took me more than two hours to draft, assemble, link, edit, proofread, and update. I have so many things I could be doing with those two hours.
But all of this – library attacks, unchecked generative AI proliferation, accurate current events reporting, and citation of sources when writing?
It’s all important.
Beetle Bailey, 9/26/25
Perverts turned on by crudely drawn cartoons everywhere were devastated this week when Beetle Bailey skipped its usual “Miss Buxley Wednesday” to do a strip about Sarge eating a pizza with a big pile of meatballs on it. But, good news: Miss Buxley is here on Friday! Bad news: it’s “casual Friday” which means she’s not wearing her sexy formal (?) little black dress. But good news: there’s some shoe stuff involving Private Blips! Bad news: the shoes are so crudely drawn that you can’t even tell what they’re supposed to look like, but you can tell that they’re definitely not very sexy. This whole week has been a real roller coaster ride for perverts, I tell you what.
Crankshaft, 9/26/25
More bad news for very specific and esoteric perverts who get off on Crankshaft’s malapropisms: today’s is no good! His dumb addled wordplay is supposed to be full of accidental polysemy, or should at least sound like it makes sense at first but upon examination doesn’t quite. This is just a wrong word that sounds like the right word! I refute this!
Barney Google and Snuffy Smith, 9/26/25
Is that … the possum’s … rib cage? I’m with you, Snuffy; I don’t care for this either. I don’t care for it at all.
Writer: Steve Englehart
Pencils: Joe Staton
Inks: Bruce Patterson
Guy Gardner and Star Sapphire team-up to smash Hal Jordan, but not in the way Carol was probably hoping for.
( Read more... )
Writer: Tom DeFalco
Pencils: Paul Ryan
Inks: Danny Bulanadi
The Fantastic Three and various hangers-on travel to the Moon to have words with the Watcher.
( Read more... )
We are going to talk about:
Side trips include historical publishing houses, how nothing in romance is new, and how a lot of our current erotica, including that book where someone schtupps a door, is connected to books with the same sexual pairings in the Victorian era.
You can find your copy of Ladies in Hating wherever you most like to acquire your books. And if your library doesn’t have it, ask them to order it for you!
Listen to the podcast →You can find Alexandra Vashti at her website, AlexandraVasti.com, and on TikTok and Instagram as @AlexandraVashti – where she posts erotic history reels!
We also discussed:
And don’t miss Alexandra’s last appearance on the show in Episode 664. Haunted Abbeys and Hidden History with Alexandra Vasti!
If you like the podcast, you can subscribe to our feed, or find us at iTunes. You can also find us on Stitcher, and Spotify, too. We also have a cool page for the podcast on iTunes.
Sponsor us through Patreon! (What is Patreon?)
What did you think of today's episode? Got ideas? Suggestions? You can talk to us on the blog entries for the podcast or talk to us on Facebook if that's where you hang out online. You can email us at sbjpodcast@gmail.com or you can call and leave us a message at our Google voice number: 201-371-3272. Please don't forget to give us a name and where you're calling from so we can work your message into an upcoming podcast.
Thanks for listening!
This podcast transcript was handcrafted with meticulous skill by Garlic Knitter. Many thanks.